Thursday, March 3, 2011

Women4Wikipedia Blog Drive

Are you a woman who has editied Wikipedia or would you like to have a shot? If so and you'd like to share your experiences with other people, please write a blog post about it for publication on your own and/or as a guest-post here on the Women4Wikpedia Blog.

What did you edit? Describe the editing process. Was the experience difficult? What advice would you give other people with the same level of experience that you had at that point?

Contributions posted here in their entirety (as guest-posts) will be published under the license preferred by the poster.

To find out more information join our forum at http://women4wikipedia.vanillaforums.com or visit http://women4wikipedia.net or @collectiveact or read our contributions below:


I'm a woman, and I've edited Wikipedia
by Spacefem
Once I got started on Wikipedia I really liked editing. I found it easiest to get involved in local stuff… articles about my state, city, neighborhood. Those are topics I’m familiar with, but they’re not all that fleshed out yet.
Read more...



Wikipedia Ponders Its Gender-Skewed Contributions

by Alexa D
The number one reason why I launched my own Women in Comics wiki, rather than focusing on building up their presence on Wikipedia, is because I had dealt with those neckbeards on WikiProject Comics before.
Read more...


Why Women & Wikis Do Mix
by Lola PR
After reading the debate in the New York Times, something that seemed obvious to me just didn't seem to really pop out from any of the debaters. Or perhaps it is obvious and other women just wouldn't say it? Women like things that look pretty..I know that a lot of people might jump out at me for over simplifying the problem and being patronising. But I really don't think that it's something that people should feel shameful about.
Read more...


Monday, February 28, 2011

Men v Women

by Rosie Williams BA (Sociology)

This opinion piece was also published at On Line Opinion on International Women's Day 2011.


I've been following the disussion on the topic of the low participation rates of women contributing to Wikipedia on the Wikipedia Gendergap Mailing List and in the media (see Twitter chat readings).

Much of the discussion has sought to clarify the differences between women and men in how we communicate and specific incidents of female victimisation by men (see Datamation article). The examples that I have seen relate to women participating in public conferences in IT, mostly programming, often in the Open Source community. Many complaints relate to inappropriate sexual referencing in public presentations at conferences, incidents of threatened or alleged inappropriate sexual behaviour and people reporting that they have been victimised due to their on line interactions including involvement with Wikipedia.

While not seeking to invalidate any of these experiences, I have noticed an absense of any examination of how women treat other women. Most examples in the media appear to involve professional women engaging in activities related directly or indirectly to their career in male-dominated industries. If one reads this media there is an overwhelming sense that there is an undertone of menace and/or disrespect experienced by women who participate in geek culture and professions.

I am not a professional woman in this sense. I can not speak to how women experience these environments and I have only limited experience with Wikipedia and am yet to find this behaviour (which does not imply I never will). What I do have quite considerable experience with is how women treat other women. Having been a single mother from the age of 19, having raised (and educated) my son on welfare, the experience of my life- both as a child and an adult- has involved negative experiences with both genders.

As a child I spent my school years being subjected to social exclusion and sustained bouts of teasing and social abuse from both boys and girls based on my not being 'girly' enough. As an adult, I have spent the last 20 years overcoming the exclusionary behaviours of partnered women who also exercised social exclusion to the point of refusing to interact with me and as a result also with my child due to my not being partnered. For a society which is one of our most advanced, in which our feminists (in the least) would have us believe that women no longer need to be partnered to be accepted within society it is quite another question to experience the lived reality of being a long term single woman and mother.

The point I wish to make about these experiences is not to defend men as I have little reason in my experience to do so but to point out that the idea that men alone police women's behaviour, perceived morality and appearence is quite illegitimate and that in fact it is women who are often the 'front line' in the systematic socialisation of girls and women in western democracies.

Women may indeed be acting within the patriarchal culture laid down for us by men and abusing other women as a result of our own fears for ourselves within it eg competing with other women for men, excluding women we feel threaten our dependency on (male/patriachal) social capital, gossiping about women's perceived morality, etc. Women are as cable as any man of creating and carrying out smear campaigns and it is usually other girls or women who are the victims of such behaviour.

For this reason I feel it important to acknowledge that women as well as men are responsible for their actions. Women make choices about which cultural norms they feel, out of fear, unable to challenge. And of course women can act independently to behave in ways that they perceive furthers their own career in the atomistic individualist cultural millieu that constitutes our western tradition. In many ways this has become the new way to be a woman.

Not that women were ever incapable of competing with one another, however, the professional woman, successful in the male fashion has become our standard of female success (other than in 'low culture'). Motherhood is still considered unskilled, 'unproductive', an embarrassment or even diametrially opposed to what feminism is seen to be about. On a national policy level we are now attempting to mitigate for our declining fertility rates- the ultimate consequence of the lack of cultural, policy and economic support of parenting.

In this debate about the gender gap on Wikipedia I have read a lot about nastiness attributed to men and its effect on women. I am not invalidating that women can and do feel intimiated when interacting with men, especially when the gender balance favours men and even sometimes when it does not. What I am not seeing in this debate is acknowledgement that women also play a mighty role in judging and therefore controlling appearance, pereceived morality and ultimately the behaviour of other women.

If we are going to call men out on their behaviour as agents of the patriarchy then we must also call out ourselves. Men are no less influenced and controlled by patriarchal culture, traditions and systems as are women. I would go so far as to say that it is unrealistic of us to expect men to free themselves of the rewards and punishments of patriarchy when we as women find it so difficult not to play along, enjoy the rewards and participate in the same punishments.


Rosie Williams is running a campaign to get more women editing Wikipedia. Called Women4wikipedia, Rosie is providing a support forum with tutorials, opportunity to network and create local groups for women.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Press Release 24 February 2011

Women4Wikipedia began when Rosie Williams, a mother from Canberra, Australia heard via Twitter that less than 13% of contributors to Wikipedia are women.

Rosie runs Collective Action a political/ethical events database for Australians. She decided to use this for its intended purpose and kick off a campaign to get more women contributing to Wikipedia. Rosie herself contributed an article to Wikipedia back in 2009 and found it a simple and positive experience and wanted more women to share this opportunity.

Through launching her own campaign, Rosie found out that Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation had begun the Wikipedia Gendergap Mailing list. In a couple of weeks Rosie had gone from being a one time editor of Wikipedia to chatting with Sue Gardner! It is this kind of networking that is the point of Women4Wikipedia: to show women what they can do when they take the chance.

Women4Wikipedia provides opportunities for women to connect virtually and in real life to provide support to one another in editing Wikipedia whether they are novices or experienced Wikipedians.

Women4Wikipedia appreciates that the more involved people get with Wikipedia, the more likely they are to get caught up in an edit war and it is those times when Women4Wikipedia can really be helpful in providing a network of support to help people through these hurdles.

If you'd like to join up with Women4Wikipedia go to http://women4wikipedia.net and click on the link to the forum or write a blog post or article on the topic. There's plenty to discuss!

Women4Wikipedia Blog Launched

Hi all!

After working on the website seemingly all week, building it from scratch I realised this morning we could do with our own blog. It is exciting being part of a campaign that is moving so fast but it is also keeping me busy and on my toes! However I'm learning every day and whilever that is happening it's all good.

So welcome to the Women4Wikipedia Blog!You can reach me on Twitter @CollectiveAct, follow #Women4Wikipedia  or via email with Women4Wikipedia in the subject line or join the forum if you are a woman and want to edit Wikipedia or be otherwise involved in the campaign.